Building the Operating System for Healthcare
We build the operating layer that hospital departments run the day on: knowledge, tasks, forms, policies, on-call and rounding, sharing one directory, one permission model and one audit log.
What we are doing
To unify healthcare operations by delivering an intelligent platform that automates workflows, standardizes policy and procedure management, and optimizes clinical operations — reducing administrative burden, improving compliance, and freeing providers to focus on patient care.
Where it goes
To be the leading partner for healthcare providers worldwide — the single, trusted platform that powers every operational decision, from the boardroom to the bedside.
Five decisions that cost us something.
A values section is easy to write and impossible to check. These are choices already made in the product, each with the price attached, so you can decide whether you agree with them.
The audit trail shipped before the features did
The hash-chained ledger and the permission model went in before the first module was usable. It is slower to build that order and it is the only order that produces a platform a compliance officer will sign off on later.
Cost: roughly a quarter before anything was demoable.
We stay out of the clinical record
The chart is not ours to own and we have turned down the work that would have made it ours. We read and write through HL7 and FHIR and keep to the operational layer: the roster, the policy, the round, the form, the task.
Cost: we will never be the biggest line item in your IT budget.
Licensing is per module, not per platform
You can buy one module and never buy another. The ones you have not licensed stay dark and cost nothing, and single sign-on, RBAC, the audit trail and both mobile apps ship with whichever one you took.
Cost: a much smaller first contract than the bundle would be.
The mobile clients are real clients
Native on iOS and Android against the same token-authenticated API the web app uses, not a web view in a shell. Rounding and approvals happen standing up in a hallway or they do not happen.
Cost: two more codebases to keep at parity, permanently.
Your database stays yours
Single-tenant install on your infrastructure, or managed hosting where the retention policy and the backup window are still yours. Every dataset has CSV export and a public versioned REST API.
Cost: no lock-in to lean on at renewal.
And five we have ruled out.
Absent from the product on purpose. If any of these is something you were hoping for, we are the wrong vendor and it is cheaper for both of us to know now.
There is one version of each module. No edition that unlocks the parts that make it worth having, and no per-user surcharge on the features you were sold.
Your content is not training material, yours or anyone else's. There is no arrangement under which that changes.
No module requires another one. If Rounds is the only thing you need, Rounds is the only thing you buy.
CSV export and the versioned REST API are part of the product, not a professional-services line item you discover on the way out.
The clinical record is not ours to own. We read and write through HL7 and FHIR and stay in the operational layer around it.
How it got here.
The idea
The gap was obvious from inside a health system: every department had bought a tool, and none of them knew about each other. One platform was the only answer that did not add a seventh login.
Building the core
Knowledge, Forms and On-Call built from the ground up, with the audit trail and the permission model in from the first commit rather than bolted on for a compliance review.
First partnerships
Founding health system partners put it in front of real clinical environments, which is where the roadmap stopped being a guess.
Six modules shipping
Policies, TaskFlow and Operational Rounds joined the set, native iOS and Android clients shipped against the same API as the web app, and per-module licensing replaced the bundle.
“We've built a product that solves real problems. Your providers will spend less time on administration and more time on care.”
Come argue with
the roadmap.
The most useful conversations we have are with people who tell us what we got wrong about their department. Whether you are evaluating, or want to build this with us, we would like to hear it.